Volume 8, Issue 2, March 2020, Page: 10-14
Frequency of ABO Blood Group and Rh (D) Negative Mothers Among Pregnant Women Attending at Antenatal Care Clinic of Sodo Health Center, SNNPR, Ethiopia
Kebreab Paulos Chanko, Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
Received: Apr. 13, 2020;       Accepted: Apr. 27, 2020;       Published: May 28, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20200802.11      View  417      Downloads  160
Background: - Women need to find out their blood type at the start of their pregnancy. Blood will be taken to find out, and there are four different types: A, B, AB, and O. In addition to blood type, women can have Rh factor (specifically Rhesus D antigen), which is when proteins appear on the surface of the blood. Women who do have Rh factors are classified as Rh positive (A+, B+, AB+, and O+), and women who don't are Rh negative (A-, B-, AB- and O). OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the frequency of ABO blood group and Rh (D) negative among pregnant women attending at antenatal care clinic of Sodo health center. METHOD: a retrospective study was conducted at the Sodo health center ANC clinic from Jan-April 2019. A total of 270 study participants was used. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Socio-demographic information was collected using pretested questionnaires. The data was edited, cleaned, entered, and analyzed by using SPSS 20. Statistical test between dependent and independent variables has been done by using multivariable logistic registration. Moreover, the table and different forms of the graph was used to present data. RESULT: Among a total of 270 study subjects, O comprised 41.1% ‘A’ (28.5%). ‘B’ and ‘AB’ accounts (24.5%) and (5.9%) respectively. Rh blood group results revealed that 7.0% of the participants were Rh-negative. CONCLUSION: This result showed that the most prevalent blood group is O while the least prevalent is the AB blood group. The frequency of Rh (D) negative pregnant women was 7.0%, among these blood group O Rh (D) negative was the most frequent. Generally, the frequency of Rh (D) negative pregnant women in this study is higher than most studies which were conducted elsewhere at different sites of the world which needs a great concern for appropriate prevention and management of Rhesus incompatibility during the antenatal visit of pregnant women.
ABO Blood Group, Rh (D) Type, Sodo, Pregnant Women
To cite this article
Kebreab Paulos Chanko, Frequency of ABO Blood Group and Rh (D) Negative Mothers Among Pregnant Women Attending at Antenatal Care Clinic of Sodo Health Center, SNNPR, Ethiopia, American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2020, pp. 10-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20200802.11
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Pramanik T., Pramanik S. Distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups in Nepalese Medical Students. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2000; 6 (1): 156–8.
Osaro E., Charles A. T. Rh isoimmunization in Sub-Saharan Africa indicates need for universal access to anti-RhD immunoglobulin and effective management of D-negative pregnancies. International Journal of Women's Health. 2010; 2: 428-37.
Patel P. A, Patel S. P., Shah J. V., Oza H. V. Frequency and distribution of blood groups in blood donors in western ahmedabad. National Journal of Medical Research. 2012; 2 (2): 200-3.
Knowles S., and Poole G., Human blood group systems. In: Practical transfusion medicine1st ed. Blackwell Science, London, UK. 2002; 24–31.
YMLo, Dennis Y. M., HjlemN. M., Fidler C., SargentI. L., MurphyM. F., Chamberlain PF., Poon PM., Redman CW., Wainscoat JS. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal RhD status by molecular analysis of maternal plasma. New England. Journal of Medical science. 1998; 337: 1734-8.
Mohammad I., Ameer M., Mohammad H., Behram K., Nusrat A., Ashfaq A., Mohsin H., Rahida K. Prevalence of rhesus type and ABO Incompatibility in jaundiced neonates. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute. 2011; 3 (25): 233-9.
Maddocks DG., Alberry MS., Attilakos G., Madgett TE., Choi K., Soothill PW., Avent ND. The SAFE project: towards non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2009; 37 (2): 460-5.
Erhabor O., Isaac Z., Yakubu A., Adias T. C. Abortion, ectopic pregnancy and miscarriages in Sub Saharan Africa: Challenges of Rhesus isoimmunisation in Rhesus negative women. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013; 3. 15-26.
Koelewijn J. M., Vrijkotle T. G., Vander School CE. Effect of screening for red cell antibodies other than anti-D to detect hemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Transfusion. 2009; 48: 941.
Hay W. W., Levin M. J., Sondheimer J. M., Deterding R. R. Current pediatric diagnosis and treatment. 18th ed. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw- Hill, 2007: 11-7.
Puangsricharern A., Suksawat S., Prevalence of Rh negative pregnant women who attended Ante Natal Clinic and delivered in Rajavithi Hospital. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2007; 90 (8): 1491-4.
Nabeel S., Bondagji. Rhesus alloimmunization in pregnancy a tertiary care center experience in the western region of Saudi Arabia. saudi medical journal. 2011; 32 (10): 1039-45.
Okeke TC., ocheni S., Nwagha U., Ibegbulam OG. The prevalence of Rhesus negativity among pregnant women in Enugu, South east Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2012; 15: 400-2.
Temitayo OI., Timothy SO., Frequency distribution of hemoglobin variants and Rh blood groups among pregnant women. American medical journal. 2013; 4 (1): 78-81.
Erhabor O., Isaac IZ., Saidu A., Ahmed HM., Abdulrahaman Y., Festus A, Ikhuenbor DB., Iwueke IP., and Adias TC. Distribution of ABO and Rhesus blood groups among residents of Gusau, Zamfara state, North Western Nigeria. Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2013; 2 (4): 58-61.
Browse journals by subject